Is your car affected?
Check by VIN to confirm the
exact model and see every recall for it.
Recalls are issued for a make, model and model year. Whether the repair has already been done on one specific car is known only to its manufacturer and dealers. Check your vehicle's official status at nhtsa.gov/recalls or with a dealer.
US recalls (1)
Suspension: front, control arm
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: PASSENGER VEHICLES. THE FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER BALL JOINTS WERE NOT TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATIONS WHEN THEY WERE ATTACHED TO THE LOWER CONTROL ARMS.
Risk and remedy
Risk: IF THE BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS ARE NOT ADEQUATELY TIGHTENED, THEY CAN LOOSEN AND, ULTIMATELY, RESULT IN FRACTURE OF THE BALL JOINT STUD. IF THE BALL JOINT FRACTURES, CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE COULD BE AFFECTED, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.
Remedy: DEALERS WILL INSPECT THE TORQUE ON THE TWO BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS. VEHICLES WITH LOOSE BALL JOINT ATTACHING NUTS WILL EITHER HAVE THE FASTENERS TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATION, OR IF NECESSARY, THE BALL JOINTS WILL BE REPLACED.
Canadian recalls (2)
Show 2 Canadian recalls
Suspension
2000-11-20 · campaign 2000-273
On certain vehicles, the front suspension lower ball joints may not have been tightened to specifications during manufacture. This could result in loosening of the attaching nuts and, ultimately result in a fracture of the ball joint stud. This could adversely affect vehicle control and a crash could occur. Should the left side ball joint fracture, the wheel and tire could contact the fuel lines or the fuel filter potentially resulting in fuel leakage. Correction: Ball joint torque will be inspected and vehicles with loose ball joints will either have the fasteners tightened to specification or if necessary, the ball joints will be replaced.
Lights and instruments
1999-09-17 · campaign 1999-165 · 497 vehicles
Certain vehicles do not comply with the requirements of CMVSS 108 - Lighting System and Retroreflective Devices. The output voltage of 9.6 volts to the headlamp high beam system during DRL (Daytime Running Lamps) operation results in a brightness exceeding the requirement of the regulation. Correction: Dealers will install a revised Front Electronics Module (FEM).
Owner complaints (354)
Owners filed 354 complaints with NHTSA about the 2000 Lincoln LS (18 crashes, 1 fires, 11 injuries, 1 deaths reported). Among 7 model years of this model, it ranks #1 for the most complaints (median 91).
| Most-reported problem | Complaints | |
|---|
| Suspension | 123 | |
| Air bags | 47 | |
| Engine and engine cooling | 42 | |
| Power train | 38 | |
| Electrical system | 24 | |
| Vehicle speed control | 22 | |
| Visibility | 20 | |
| Service brakes, hydraulic | 20 | |
Fuel economy
EPA ratings for each 2000 Lincoln LS version.
| Version | City MPG | Highway MPG | Combined | Yearly fuel cost |
|---|
| LS 3.0 L Automatic 5-spd | 16 | 23 | 18 | $4,550 |
| LS 3.0 L Automatic 5-spd | 15 | 22 | 18 | $4,550 |
| LS 3.0 L Manual 5-spd | 15 | 23 | 18 | $4,550 |
| LS 3.9 L Automatic 5-spd | 15 | 22 | 17 | $4,850 |
| LS 3.9 L Automatic 5-spd | 15 | 22 | 17 | $4,850 |
Need this data in your app?
Recalls, complaints, crash ratings and fuel economy as a JSON API. Decode up to 50 VINs per call and get a daily feed of new recalls.
Explore the API →Sources: NHTSA recalls, complaints and 5-Star Safety Ratings, US EPA fuel economy and Transport
Canada's Vehicle Recalls Database (contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Canada).
Recalls updated 2026-10-30.